COLD WATER THROWN ON GLOBAL WARMING PREDICTIONS

And you believed in man-made global warming...I bet you stand around shouting "yes we can" too.

Antarctica hasn't warmed as much over the last century as climate models had originally predicted, a new study finds.

The new study, detailed in the April 5 issue of the journal Geophysical Research Letters, marks the first time that researchers have been able to give a progress report on Antarctic climate model projections by comparing climate records to model simulations. (These comparisons have already been done for the other six continents.)

"This is a really important exercise for these climate models," said study leader Andrew Monaghan of the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Co.

Monaghan and his team found that while climate models projected temperature increases of 1.4 degrees Fahrenheit (0.75 degrees Celsius) over the past century, temperatures were observed to have risen by only 0.4 F (0.2 C).

BUSTED AGAIN: NBC CAUGHT FABRICATING ANOTHER NEWS REPORT ABOUT GLOBAL WARMING

This is the second time this reporter, Michelle Kosinski, has been caught in an embarrassing news reporting fabrication.

What's worse is that NBC reposted this video without the Penguins later.

Watch...

GLOBAL WARMING TO TAKE THE NEXT TEN YEARS OFF

Oh sure...Now they tell me...AFTER I put the malamutes to sleep.

Average temperatures in areas such as California and France may drop over the next 10 years, influenced by colder flows in the North Atlantic, said a report today by the institution based in Kiel, Germany. Temperatures worldwide may stabilize in the period.

``If we don't experience warming over the next 10 years, it doesn't mean that greenhouse-gas warming is not with us,'' Keenlyside said in an interview. ``There can be natural fluctuations that may mask climate change in the short term.''

``Natural variations over the next 10 years might be heading in the cold direction,'' Wood said. ``If you run the model long enough, eventually global warming will win.''

``We thought a lot about the way to present this because we don't want it to be turned around in the wrong way,'' Keenlyside said. ``I hope it doesn't become a message of Exxon Mobil and other skeptics.''

All this means is that the global warming whackos have a huge hole in their theory and need some way to explain what is going to be a coming cooling period. What's the easiest way to do that, and still keep scaring the hell out of people? Tell them that the global warming monster is just going take a long nap. But when he wakes up, he's going to be pissed about the shaving cream on his nose.
*

SCIENTIST WHO VOTED FOR GORE DEBUNKS GLOBAL WARMING FEARS

The global warming hoax takes another massive hit...Scramble the jets Al.

We’ve been warming up about a degree per century since the Little Ice Age in about 1600. We’ve been warming for 400 years, long before human-generated CO2 could have anything to do with the climate. If we project the previous century into the coming one, my projection is that we will have about a half-a-degree of cooling from 2007 (plus or minus three to five years) to about 2040. Then it will start getting warmer as we enter the next warm cycle, followed by cooling again.

For a number of interviews, especially in the national news media, they ask ‘Are you a Republican?’ and I say ‘No, I’m not, as a matter of fact, I voted for Al Gore. I don’t want to pick on him because he’s not a scientist.’ The nonsense he spews comes from the IPCC [United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change], so in a sense I don’t condemn him as much as I do the so-called climatologists like [James] Hansen, who says things that are idiotic. They’re the ones giving him all this stuff.

Al Gore makes a hundred-million dollars? He has five-billion in his slush fund? Look at [U.S. Senator] Barbara Boxer, she sponsored a bill for carbon cap and trade [Sanders/Boxer Global Warming Bill S.309]. Who will benefit from hundreds of billions of dollars for administering a scheme like that? The other thing is research funding. The U.S. spends about two-billion dollars a year on research. Right now, if you submit anything that says CO2 is not the bad guy, you won’t have a chance of getting funding. It all goes to the CO2 people who build little fiefdoms; they have grant money coming out of their ears.

Global warming "fiefdoms"...I'm going to use that.
*